Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Juror's Statements
For artists entering their art works to an art show, it is very helpful to know the jurors criteria used for selecting works to be included or awards made in the show.
***********************
For the 2011 Glendale Adult Center Art Show May 3rd-May 30th Larry Willis wrote the following:
First, thank you for inviting me to jury your exhibition. I enjoyed the experience especially when I found out there were going to be no pieces left out of the show. All I had to do was give awards. I enjoy looking at art and those involved in the creative process. So it is hard for me to judge harshly those who are pursuing what they love to do. I once expressed, “Those who can - create, those who can’t - curate and everybody is a critic.” When you are a juror you take on the last two roles. (I’d rather be creating.) When evaluating art I look for three criteria, (1) skill of media (technique), (2) inventiveness (originality of idea) and (3) balance (this can be balance of design, color or both). When all of these come together … it’s great. All of the pieces that received awards, including honorable mentions, displayed at least one of these, many two and some all three. (Others that didn’t get ribbons displayed some of these qualities also.)some who got honorable mentions were in the running for higher place (it was hard to decide.)
In “A Grand Evening”, Carl Holle’s originality was scale. Grand can mean large, but the grandeur was displayed in a small piece. It also had balance of design, color and showed his skill as a painter.
Something to keep in mind is that all judging of art is subjective. What I chose might have been different from another’s choice. When I began entering my work in exhibits I put 3 paintings before one jury and all were rejected. I entered the same three in another juried exhibit and got 1st place in painting. This gave me perspective so as to not take it too hard.
Again Thanks, Larry Willis
www.phoenixartspace.com/larrywillis
**********************
For the Phoenix Artists Guild 2011 Spring Exhibit at the Beatitudes Church, Juror Ruth Knowles, Arizona Artists Guild President wrote this:
***********************
For the 2011 Glendale Adult Center Art Show May 3rd-May 30th Larry Willis wrote the following:
First, thank you for inviting me to jury your exhibition. I enjoyed the experience especially when I found out there were going to be no pieces left out of the show. All I had to do was give awards. I enjoy looking at art and those involved in the creative process. So it is hard for me to judge harshly those who are pursuing what they love to do. I once expressed, “Those who can - create, those who can’t - curate and everybody is a critic.” When you are a juror you take on the last two roles. (I’d rather be creating.) When evaluating art I look for three criteria, (1) skill of media (technique), (2) inventiveness (originality of idea) and (3) balance (this can be balance of design, color or both). When all of these come together … it’s great. All of the pieces that received awards, including honorable mentions, displayed at least one of these, many two and some all three. (Others that didn’t get ribbons displayed some of these qualities also.)some who got honorable mentions were in the running for higher place (it was hard to decide.)
In “A Grand Evening”, Carl Holle’s originality was scale. Grand can mean large, but the grandeur was displayed in a small piece. It also had balance of design, color and showed his skill as a painter.
Something to keep in mind is that all judging of art is subjective. What I chose might have been different from another’s choice. When I began entering my work in exhibits I put 3 paintings before one jury and all were rejected. I entered the same three in another juried exhibit and got 1st place in painting. This gave me perspective so as to not take it too hard.
Again Thanks, Larry Willis
www.phoenixartspace.com/larrywillis
**********************
For the Phoenix Artists Guild 2011 Spring Exhibit at the Beatitudes Church, Juror Ruth Knowles, Arizona Artists Guild President wrote this:
Phoenix
Artists Guild Spring Exhibition
Looking at art work gives me an opportunity to see
people’s unique vision, their personal interpretation of their world. I also appreciate seeing a certain amount of
risk taking some artists take to convey their vision. Thank you.
The PAG Exhibition presented challenges for me as a juror
of awards. I selected work that
illustrated technical skill and craftsmanship in the particular medium as well
as attention to the basic Elements of Art and Principles of Design. I also considered Concept, Originality, and
Composition of each piece. Additionally,
I wanted the hand of the artist to invite me to look closer and to linger.
As a caution, I remind artists to present work as simply
as possible: neutral mats, simple frames.
Try not to be influenced by a framer or a garage sale find.
----Ruth Knowles
Robert Genn, High Ego Force
Robert Genn’s Twice Weekly Letter, The Painter's Keys
website.,
today wrote:
It may have more to do with the old business of "character."
In our game, character is the confluence of four virtues:
high motivation,
high curiosity,
high work habits
and high ego force.
Funnily, among the folks I compete with, those four virtues
are most often found among the unschooled.”
and he also included a John Holt quote,
"What makes people
smart,
curious,
alert,
observant,
competent,
confident,
resourceful,
persistent--
is not having access to more and more learning places,
resources, and specialists,
but being able in their lives to do a wide variety of
interesting things that matter, things that challenge their ingenuity, skill,
and judgment, and that make an obvious difference in their lives and the lives
of people around them." (John
Holt)
Robert Genn’s message content was thought provoking. The ‘high
ego force’ is a phrase I have not seen before, and yet it is so descriptive of
leaders and achievers. It is the propelling fuel of initiative overcoming the
inertia of stale mate, status quos, and apathetic, conforming acceptance of
existing environmental or social negatives surrounding us.
There exists an operative social conditioner which chastises persons for
being too egotistical, and why is that? Conceit is not a virtue, and it is
linked to being too egotistical and self centered (selfish). What is the magic
that separates high ego force from egotistical and conceited?
Perhaps Robert is linking high ego force with self esteem and belief in
one’s abilities to overcome obstacles, to be able to make productive progress by
eliminating problems? Persons who say “I can” versus those who say “I can’t”
have high ego force. The traits and attributes of achievers distinguishes them
from non achievers. Can persons achieve if not being self motivated, action
oriented, and having a strong knowledge of who they are regardless of others
preferring they be someone different, or others attempting to change either this
or that in them? It is essential to know when to listen to others, but to not
abandon self determination and personal self development as determined by your
innate self directives.
Polonius:
This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell, my blessing season this in thee!
This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell, my blessing season this in thee!
Laertes:
Most humbly do I take my leave, my lord.
Most humbly do I take my leave, my lord.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)